The Challenges of One-Person Accounting Departments (and Where to Start)
- Brett J. Federer, CPA

- Sep 13, 2025
- 3 min read
Updated: Sep 14, 2025

One-person accounting departments don’t fail because of a lack of skill, but because the workload leaves no room for review, improvement, or rest. What seems lean and efficient in the early days often hides a growing strain that compounds month after month. At first, the deadlines are met, the reconciliations get done, and the books close on time — but beneath that surface, cracks begin to form. Without bandwidth for structure or oversight, errors slip through, processes stall, and the burden falls heavier on the person holding it all together. It isn’t a question of ability; it’s a question of capacity. And eventually, the pressure creates the very mess the company was trying to avoid.
This blog continues the theme from Why Messy Accounting Departments Cost More Than You Think, showing how the earliest form of ‘mess’ begins when the function is placed on one person’s desk.
The Core Challenges of One-Person Accounting Departments
1. Capacity Overload
When every responsibility — payables, receivables, payroll, reconciliations, reporting — sits with one person, there’s simply too much to carry. The work gets done, but it’s reactive, rushed, and often without the breathing room needed for careful review. The volume alone makes mistakes inevitable.
2. Lack of Segregation of Duties
With one person responsible for recording, approving, and reconciling, checks and balances disappear. This isn’t just a risk of fraud — it’s also a risk of honest mistakes going unnoticed until they snowball into material problems.
3. Limited Perspective
When you’re deep in every detail, it’s nearly impossible to step back and see structural weaknesses. Process gaps that would stand out to a second set of eyes often go unnoticed, leaving inefficiencies to calcify over time.
4. Constant Reactivity
One-person departments rarely have the luxury of being proactive. Instead of building policies, automating tasks, or planning for growth, the focus stays locked on survival — meeting the next deadline, fixing the next issue. This short-term focus eventually costs more than it saves.
5. No Room for Improvement
When every hour is spent on survival, there’s no time left to rework processes or adopt new tools. Even small fixes that could ease the load get delayed indefinitely, locking the department into inefficient patterns.
6. Strain Around Additional Requests
Colleagues hesitate to ask for what they need, knowing the accountant is already stretched thin. And when new tasks do land, frustration can surface — not from unwillingness, but from exhaustion. Over time, this tension creates blind spots and leaves important work undone.
Where to Start (Practical First Steps)
Document the Close
Even a simple month-end checklist helps build repeatability and consistency.
Prioritize Reconciliations
Start with high-risk, high-volume accounts — bank, credit cards, payroll — and ensure they’re clean.
Introduce Basic Policies
A one-page rule on expense approvals or revenue cutoff dates can prevent major confusion down the line.
Leverage Small Automations
Recurring journal templates, bank feed rules, and reporting shortcuts ease the time crunch.
Flag the Risks You Can’t Fix
Communicate with leadership about where one person can’t reasonably provide oversight, like approvals or volume scaling.
The Long-Term View
A one-person department can only carry so much before the cracks show. That doesn’t mean it’s doomed — it means leadership needs to recognize when lean turns into stretched too thin. Adding support doesn’t always mean hiring full-time; it might be a part-time bookkeeper, an outsourced controller, or fractional help during growth phases. The earlier this shift happens, the less expensive the cleanup later.
Wrap-Up
Messy accounting departments don’t usually start messy — they become messy when the foundation is overloaded. One-person departments are the clearest example: what looks like efficiency today can easily become tomorrow’s bottleneck. The key isn’t questioning capability, but recognizing capacity. And knowing when to move from surviving the work to structuring it.
Don’t wait until your department is overwhelmed — get ahead of the mess here.


