Built for companies whose bookkeeping exists, but whose numbers wouldn’t feel solid in front of a board, lender, or investor.
Most businesses don’t struggle because they lack data. They struggle because nothing connects. Reports exist, but they don’t create certainty. Metrics are available, but they don’t guide decisions. When bookkeeping stops being enough but CFO-level services still feel premature, the problem is almost always structure.
You’re Past Bookkeeping — But Not Ready for a CFO.
That’s where this work begins. Not with more reports, and not with theory, but by establishing or reinforcing the systems that make your financials dependable. The close becomes something you trust. Reporting becomes something you actually rely on. Instead of managing around uncertainty, you start making decisions from solid ground.
This work is built for startups and scaling businesses that want their financial environment to feel intentional and dependable as operations grow more complex. Bookkeeping, tax, and payroll stay with your existing team or providers so the focus here remains on the structure above that layer and how the close and reporting support real decisions over time.
Structure is built intentionally or maintained with discipline. While recurring work is what keeps it reliable over time.
This work doesn’t operate at the bookkeeping level.
It also doesn’t step into CFO leadership.
This work provides the financial backbone in between. The part most companies never intentionally install or maintain, and later wonder why everything feels unstable.
Because stability now is what makes freedom possible later.


What You Have
What You Gain
Fragile Books
Financial Blindspots
Disconnected Numbers
Unreliable Numbers
Founder Overload
Reliable Financials
+
=
Where financial structure becomes lasting stability.
Clear Financial Context
Decision Confidence
Compounding Stability
Lower Stress
How My Services Stack Up
Who to Choose?
Service | Bookkeeper + AI | Brett J Federer Accounting | In-House Controller | Fractional CFO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Transactional Data Entry | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
Operational Tax Processing | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
Structured Month-End Close | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
Internal Financial Reporting | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
Accounting System Oversight | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
Long Term Strategy | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
Relative Cost | 🪙 | 🪙 🪙 | 🪙 🪙 🪙 🪙 | 🪙 🪙 🪙 |
What You're Paying For | Basic Data Entry, AI Automation | Financial Structure Without the overhead | Full-Time Employee Operational Finance | Strategic Finance Partner High-Level Strategy |
When to Engage?
Title | Founding Stage | Early Growth (Post-Revenue) | Scaling & Growth | Seeking Investment | Expanding Operations | Preparing to Exit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bookkeeper + AI | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ |
Brett J. Federer Accounting | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ |
Fractional CFO | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
AI Where It Works.
Humans Where It Counts

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has made financial processes faster, but speed alone isn’t enough. Clean, trustworthy numbers still require human oversight. The smartest companies aren’t choosing between AI and expertise. They’re blending both—using automation for efficiency, and people for oversight and judgment.
🔹 AI generates data, humans ensure it’s reliable.
🔹 AI streamlines execution, expertise ensures structure.
🔹 Automation saves time, structure ensures stability
Financial blind spots happen when numbers are left unchecked. That’s why AI should assist, not replace expert oversight. At Brett J. Federer Accounting, AI is used to streamline workflows when it improves clarity, efficiency, or accuracy. Every report and structure remains grounded in human judgment and experience.
Because smart finance isn’t just about numbers. It’s about structure that grows from sapling to forest.
I only work with a few founders at a time because clarity dies with chaos.
Clarity scales best when focus is protected, so each client receives deliberate attention and lasting clarity when the fit is right.
Your Financials Should Feel Calm
Want to talk through how this structure would work inside your business?
Click the trees below.
Fixed Price = Fixed Scope
Once onboarding is complete, services move into a fixed monthly price with a fixed scope. This keeps things fair, focused, and balanced on both sides.
By default, monthly services are not billed hourly and don’t include hidden fees, which keeps the engagement focused rather than on-call. That also means I’m not an on-call accountant.
To protect the integrity of the system and maintain focus, I stick to a defined scope once monthly fees begin. If something new comes up that falls outside of that, I’ll flag it early. If it’s worth tackling, we can always scope it as a separate project.
No pressure. No surprises. Just structure that lasts.
Like a phone's automatic update, I make quiet changes that enhance performance.
Every adjustment keeps the process running smoothly;
it's easy as pie.
Where appropriate, small refinements are applied so the monthly close runs lean and consistent.
During monthly services, minor adjustments may be made when they support the close or preserve accuracy or stability. Larger changes such as system redesigns, major workflow shifts, or new automations are handled as separately scoped projects, unless they fall within the Financial Clarity Package implementation phase.
How Research Is Handled (By Phase)
Some engagements require research, especially when building or restructuring financial systems. How research is handled depends on the phase of your engagement.
Implementation & Onboarding Phase:
Research is part of the work being performed and is billed through your monthly retainer, with hourly overage if work exceeds the retainer.
Recurring Services Phase:
Reasonable research directly supporting your monthly close and reporting is included. At this stage, you are no longer paying for discovery. You are paying for stability.
Separate scoping applies only when research:
-
is unique to your company’s structure or model
-
is a specialized accounting topic (e.g. ASC 606, inventory costing, amortization logic, etc.)
-
is a platform-specific setup or integration issue (e.g. Stripe logic, software configuration, etc.)
-
requires substantial, one-time research that is unusually time-intensive, even if related to agreed deliverables
-
involves or relates to a custom setup outside the agreed deliverables
If anything grows beyond scope, I will flag it early and we can decide how to proceed.
This policy is designed to be fair—not endless.
If the line between research and custom work starts getting blurry —
I’ll recommend scoping a separate project to keep everything clean, respectful, and aligned.
Financial Clarity,
One Post at a Time
Build Structure That Frees You.
I’ve designed this system for founders who want clean, consistent financials and the confidence to make decisions without second-guessing.
———
If that’s what you’re building toward, I’m here.










